arbiter
JournalsAccount

Examining cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia

Hanudin Amin et al.

International Journal of Social Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-12-2023-0964article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.48

Abstract

Purpose This study examined Muslim civil officers’ cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach Using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), the effects of the said factors on the decisions were examined using logistic analysis. A total of 583 Muslim civil officers were involved in this work. The discrete dependent variable measures whether a civil officer is a donor or non-donor cash waqf. Findings Results obtained indicate significant influences of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and some demographic items on cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia. Research limitations/implications The findings attained were narrowed in terms of chosen geographical settings and the theory used. Practical implications This study provides a theoretical benchmark to enhance cash waqf giving decisions, which in turn can affect the waqf collection by the waqf institutions in Malaysia. Originality/value This study uniquely develops Muslim civil officers’ cash waqf giving decisions framework (CAGDEF) in measuring cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0964.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-12-2023-0964

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hanudin2025,
  title        = {{Examining cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia}},
  author       = {Hanudin Amin et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Social Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-12-2023-0964},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Examining cash waqf giving decisions in Malaysia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.