Genuine DeFi as Critical Infrastructure: A Conceptual Framework for Combating Illicit Finance Activity in Decentralized Finance
Rebecca Rettig et al.
Abstract
Combating illicit financial activity in permissionless blockchain-based financial systems—referred to as ‘decentralized finance’ or ‘DeFi’—has challenged regulators and policymakers. Traditional financial integrity laws and regulations—dealing with anti-money laundering (AML), countering the financing of terrorism (CFT), and sanctions—attach to intermediaries, including, with respect to AML/CFT obligations, those intermediaries the Bank Secrecy Act defines as ‘financial institutions’. This article proposes a framework to effectively detect, deter, and prevent illicit financial activity in DeFi, while preserving the technology as permissionless, neutral infrastructure. The three-part proposal sets forth a definition of ‘independent control’ in order to identify smart contract-based financial protocols that do not constitute DeFi; seeks to classify genuine DeFi protocols as ‘critical infrastructure’, subject to oversight and security coordination by the Treasury Department’s Office of Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection; and suggests that new laws could require certain businesses necessary to the transmittal of communications about DeFi transactions to take on additional illicit finance risk-management practices without being subject to the Bank Secrecy Act.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.