Co-production trajectories: rethinking impact formation in knowledge co-production

Sonja K Nielsen & Sampsa Hyysalo

Science and Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag001article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Despite growing interest in knowledge co-production for environmental governance, questions remain about whether and how it creates societal impacts. A central challenge is attributing impacts to particular co-production arrangements. Existing literature tends to assume that co-production arrangements are the originators of impacts. However, this assumption obscures how societal outcomes actually form and makes their substantiation difficult. Using a trajectory-based approach from science and technology studies to study transition arenas, we show how co-production is primarily involved with change processes that are already underway before co-production begins and continue well after it ends. In this view, co-production primarily contributes to these outcomes rather than producing them. These contributions depend on the issues and actor ecologies involved. This processual approach offers a complementary and more nuanced lens to conventional evaluation models, helping policymakers set more realistic expectations and improve the design and integration of co-production into policy processes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sonja2026,
  title        = {{Co-production trajectories: rethinking impact formation in knowledge co-production}},
  author       = {Sonja K Nielsen & Sampsa Hyysalo},
  journal      = {Science and Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Co-production trajectories: rethinking impact formation in knowledge co-production

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.