What could explain low uptake of rural electricity programs in Africa? Empirical evidence from rural Tanzania

Remidius Ruhinduka et al.

Environment and Development Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x25000099article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Increasing electricity access remains a challenge, particularly in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa. This study examines the case of Tanzania, where connection rates remain low even among rural households residing ‘under the grid’, and this despite substantial government subsidies for household connections. Using data from 1,774 rural households living within reach of the electricity grid, we investigate correlates of the low grid electricity uptake. We find that proxies for wealth are positively associated with connection status, while social network variables are less so. Capacity to pay thus appears to remain a major barrier, and in-house wiring costs emerge as a significant expense unaddressed by the existing subsidy scheme, exceeding grid connection costs sevenfold. Similar mechanisms influence the choice between grid electricity and traditional or solar energy sources. These findings inform the ongoing policy debate on subsidy design and the role of alternative energy sources in expanding access.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x25000099

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{remidius2025,
  title        = {{What could explain low uptake of rural electricity programs in Africa? Empirical evidence from rural Tanzania}},
  author       = {Remidius Ruhinduka et al.},
  journal      = {Environment and Development Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x25000099},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What could explain low uptake of rural electricity programs in Africa? Empirical evidence from rural Tanzania

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.