First-level fundamentals: computer ownership is more important for internet benefits than in-home internet service

Amy Gonzales & Xinyi Zhang

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf007article
AJG 3
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Although computers, smartphones, and internet service are essential 21st century tools, digital equity stakeholders often focus on in-home internet service in their advocacy. Yet few scholars have compared the associated benefits of different fundamental digital resources. In response, a cross-sectional analysis of two waves of U.S. census data (2020, N = 84,206; 2023, N = 82,941) revealed that computer use (laptop/desktop) was consistently a stronger predictor of beneficial internet use (e.g., job searches, government resources, and eHealth) than smartphone access or in-home internet service, and device quality explained additional model variance. Moreover, computer use without in-home internet was more beneficial than in-home internet without computer use, and in-home internet was especially important in homes with smartphones. These findings add nuance to resources and appropriation theory and the technology maintenance framework, and underscore that internet and devices are both important, requiring policies that facilitate access to both.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{amy2025,
  title        = {{First-level fundamentals: computer ownership is more important for internet benefits than in-home internet service}},
  author       = {Amy Gonzales & Xinyi Zhang},
  journal      = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

First-level fundamentals: computer ownership is more important for internet benefits than in-home internet service

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.