Navigating Choice Overload: How Time Pressure and Visual Display Shape Tourist Decisions

Hui Luo et al.

Journal of Travel Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424436article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Existing research has predominantly examined choice overload in general consumption contexts or travel planning; its occurrence within destination experiences remains understudied. This research explores the effects of choice set size, cognitive load, and emotional experience within the context of tourism experience. Guided by cognitive load theory, the findings from four studies demonstrate that large (vs. small) choice sets reduce choice satisfaction and increase choice regret, explained by perceived similarity and decision difficulty among choices. The effect of choice overload is mitigated when tourists make decisions under time pressure (objective and subjective) and when product information is presented sequentially rather than simultaneously, serving as key boundary conditions. These findings provide practical implications for managers to mitigate the choice overload effect through multi-topic and multi-period product configurations, increased time pressure on decision-making, and adjustments in information presentation formats.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424436

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hui2026,
  title        = {{Navigating Choice Overload: How Time Pressure and Visual Display Shape Tourist Decisions}},
  author       = {Hui Luo et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Travel Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424436},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating Choice Overload: How Time Pressure and Visual Display Shape Tourist Decisions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.