arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Unveiling Rating Bias Through Synthetic Controls: The Case of Moody’s and Berkshire

Yixiao Jiang

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091526500153article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper examines whether Moody’s 2000 IPO compromised its independence as a credit rating agency. Using synthetic controls, we construct a counterfactual rating trajectory for Berkshire Hathaway-affiliated firms — Moody’s largest post-IPO shareholder — and compare it to actual ratings. Results show significant rating inflation for these firms, peaking at nearly two notches by 2005 and fading thereafter. This effect exceeds prior difference-in-differences estimates. Placebo and robustness tests affirm significance. Findings underscore concentrated ownership’s influence in reputation-sensitive industries and highlight conflicts of interest in credit ratings. The study advances literature on rating inflation and shareholder activism by revealing how large shareholders can distort incentives and market information.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091526500153

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yixiao2026,
  title        = {{Unveiling Rating Bias Through Synthetic Controls: The Case of Moody’s and Berkshire}},
  author       = {Yixiao Jiang},
  journal      = {Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091526500153},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unveiling Rating Bias Through Synthetic Controls: The Case of Moody’s and Berkshire

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.