Mapping the research landscape of mobile health applications: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Ezgi Delen & Burcu İlter

Health Marketing Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2026.2624296article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this scoping review combines bibliometric and systematic analyses of 50 studies selected from 1,870 records screened for mobile health applications published between 2013 and 2024. The review identifies publication trends, conceptual structures, and key variables used in research. The findings reveal five thematic clusters under two main themes: user-centered experiences and psychological dimensions (1) and system-level design and health service integration (2). Although research on mobile health applications has grown rapidly, previous reviews lacked an integrated approach combining conceptual mapping with applied insights. This study addresses that gap by offering a foundation for future research and ecosystem development.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2026.2624296

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ezgi2026,
  title        = {{Mapping the research landscape of mobile health applications: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis}},
  author       = {Ezgi Delen & Burcu İlter},
  journal      = {Health Marketing Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2026.2624296},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mapping the research landscape of mobile health applications: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.