Promoting Unorthodox Money Doctoring: Arthur Bloomfield and the West Indian Federation

Brendan Brundage & Guy Numa

History of Political Economy2025https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12213449article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Money doctors played a crucial role in establishing and advising central banks in underdeveloped countries in the twentieth century. However, the Bretton Woods order transformed the doctors’ prescriptions after the Second World War. Arthur Bloomfield was a part of this “new generation” who attempted to equip central banks with wide-ranging policy tools in contrast to the rigid instruments proposed by the previous generation of experts. Bloomfield's assignment to the British West Indies in 1960–61 is an example of the change in vision of US foreign monetary policy. A significant characteristic of the new tradition was to let the environment of the country or region determine the exact approach of central banking. Therefore, the political and economic conditions of the West Indies, and the efforts to achieve regional integration and gain independence, were a principal consideration for Bloomfield and his advice for the region.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12213449

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brendan2025,
  title        = {{Promoting Unorthodox Money Doctoring: Arthur Bloomfield and the West Indian Federation}},
  author       = {Brendan Brundage & Guy Numa},
  journal      = {History of Political Economy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12213449},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Promoting Unorthodox Money Doctoring: Arthur Bloomfield and the West Indian Federation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.