Reducing political polarization through conversations with artificial intelligence

Timon M. J. Hruschka & Markus Appel

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmag003article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Political polarization is threatening the welfare of individuals and societies. Connecting insights gained from interpersonal communication to human–machine communication, we hypothesized that positive interactions with artificial intelligence (AI) could reduce polarization between humans. To evaluate this proposition, two experiments were conducted, in which human participants (N = 1,035) communicated with AI chatbots in real time. The bots engaged in different communication styles while opposing the participants’ most polarized political views. Across both experiments, engaging with a counterarguing AI chatbot led to significant issue depolarization. AI chatbots exhibiting high (vs. low) conversational receptiveness and active listening during the AI conversation resulted in stronger affective depolarization toward humans, higher participant intellectual humility, and a greater willingness to engage in future conversations with holders of opposing opinions—AI and humans alike. Our experiments show that large language models are powerful tools for individual depolarization and the promotion of beneficial cognitive processing skills.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmag003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{timon2026,
  title        = {{Reducing political polarization through conversations with artificial intelligence}},
  author       = {Timon M. J. Hruschka & Markus Appel},
  journal      = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmag003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reducing political polarization through conversations with artificial intelligence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.