Consumer Perceived Value and Decision Outcome in Multi-Channel Retail : A Systematic Literature Review
Dinesh Sharma & Tapan Kumar Panda
What the paper says
Purpose : Increasing research on multi-channel identifies various disconnected factors influencing customer decision-making behavior. Collecting and synthesizing this data was imperative to provide practitioners with pertinent insights. This paper examined the current research on multi-channel retailing consumer decision outcomes (CDOs) from the lens of consumer perceived value (CPV).Methodology : This study employed a systematic literature review to delineate the existing knowledge at the junction of CPV and CDO in multi-channel (siloed or integrated) retailing.Findings : A systematic review of 152 peer-reviewed articles published in English-language journals indicated that multi-channel CDOs are predominantly examined as a consequence of the perceived value of multi-channel dimensions rather than linked to retailing marketing and management. This study introduced a conceptual framework for multi-channel CDOs’ antecedents, episodes, and consequences.Practical Implications : The results indicated techniques for utilizing customer decision outcomes to enhance returns for retail marketers and managers. These insights will assist field personnel in attaining consumer decision-making behavior objectives.Originality : This is among the first studies to conduct a systematic review of exhaustive peer-reviewed articles to delineate existing gaps and potential for future research by mapping the intersection of multi-channel customer-perceived value and CDOs. Further, this study provided various findings on retailing studies by segregating findings between articles corresponding to multichannel and omnichannel.
4 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15 |
| M · momentum | 0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.