Portfolio Allocation Bias of Oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds

Kai Lessmann et al.

Strategic Behavior and the Environment2024https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000109article
AJG 1
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

Many sovereign wealth funds have expansive portfolios that give them the chance to influence markets through their investment choices. In this study, we analyze how oil extraction as a source of wealth influences portfolio allocation. We find that revenues from oil extraction affect the speculative motive and the hedging motives in opposite ways and create a portfolio allocation bias for oil-based funds. A numerical application of the model disentangles the motives and quantifies the bias. We find a positive bias in the portfolio allocation of an oil-based fund, which is increasing in the correlation of assets. Sensitivity analyzes show which parameters reduce the portfolio bias, turning the bias from "dirty" to "green" for large deviations from the default calibration. When a price on carbon is introduced, the intended reallocation of assets away from the oil-intensive sector is dampened by an amplification of the portfolio bias.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000109

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kai2024,
  title        = {{Portfolio Allocation Bias of Oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds}},
  author       = {Kai Lessmann et al.},
  journal      = {Strategic Behavior and the Environment},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000109},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Portfolio Allocation Bias of Oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.