arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

ARE TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING METHODS STILL RELEVANT ON CLIENT PURCHASE INTENTION

Jilson Zimuto et al.

EPH-International Journal of Business & Management Science2022https://doi.org/10.53555/ephbms.v8i1.1916article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Although there has been considerable research on traditional advertising methods, this study sought to establish their influence on client purchase intention in the banking industry. Data were collected from the bank clients in Gauteng, South Africa. After the analysis, results showed positive relationships between the traditional advertising methods and purchase intention. Moreover, the findings indicated that the four traditional advertising methods have stood the test of time and are still relevant in influencing client purchase intention in the banking industry, despite the digital era.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53555/ephbms.v8i1.1916

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jilson2022,
  title        = {{ARE TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING METHODS STILL RELEVANT ON CLIENT PURCHASE INTENTION}},
  author       = {Jilson Zimuto et al.},
  journal      = {EPH-International Journal of Business & Management Science},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53555/ephbms.v8i1.1916},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

ARE TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING METHODS STILL RELEVANT ON CLIENT PURCHASE INTENTION

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.06 × 0.4 = 0.02
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.