Real Effects of Board Reforms: International Evidence

Songyi Han et al.

Journal of International Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2025-009article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Prior studies show that country-level board reforms, aimed at enhancing independence, positively affect firm value, but the channels remain unclear. This paper investigates improved corporate financing and investment as a channel. Using an estimation method robust to heterogeneous treatment effects, we find that board reforms increase external financing and investment, suggesting that they enhance investors' confidence about board oversight and willingness to provide capital. Subsample analyses reveal conditions where reforms are more effective. First, the positive impact on external financing is driven by comply-or-explain reforms vis-à-vis rule-based reforms. This indicates that flexible reforms work better and that strict board reforms disrupt optimally designed board structures. Second, financially constrained firms benefit more, reinforcing the role of reforms in raising investor capital provision. Finally, we document a complementary relation between board reforms and country-level investor protection and legal enforceability, underscoring the role of high-quality institutions in enhancing the effectiveness of board reforms. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: G14; G18; M41; M48.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2025-009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{songyi2026,
  title        = {{Real Effects of Board Reforms: International Evidence}},
  author       = {Songyi Han et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of International Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2025-009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Real Effects of Board Reforms: International Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.