The Impact of Female Executives on the Quality and Comparability of Financial Statements: Evidence from the U.S.

Xiang Gao et al.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting2025https://doi.org/10.12775/cjfa.2024.012article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

In this article, we examine the impact of female CFOs on Financial Statement Comparability (FSC) in a U.S. setting. Using a sample of publicly traded U.S. firms between the years 1992 and 2023, we compare firms with female CFOs against those with male CFOs using pooled panel regressions. We also examine firms with male to female CFO changes and vice versa using difference in difference regressions. We find that female CFO firms have a 1.1% higher FSC on average than male CFO firms. Further, firms that switch from having a male CFO to a female CFO experience FSC increases of 17.5%. On the contrary, firms that switch from having female CFOs to male CFOs experience FSC decreases of 7.6%. Thus, we conclude that firms with female CFOs have higher FSC than those with male CFOs. We believe that our findings are significant to regulators and legislators and also add supporting evidence in favor of the push for increased female representation in the C-suite.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12775/cjfa.2024.012

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiang2025,
  title        = {{The Impact of Female Executives on the Quality and Comparability of Financial Statements: Evidence from the U.S.}},
  author       = {Xiang Gao et al.},
  journal      = {Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12775/cjfa.2024.012},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Impact of Female Executives on the Quality and Comparability of Financial Statements: Evidence from the U.S.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.