The challenges of teaching complexity sciences to novice learners in public administration

Neil Gilbride

Teaching Public Administration2025https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360758article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

There is a rich history of examining the functions and activities of public administration through the lens of complexity theory. Arguments for training and educating public administrators in this discipline are both longstanding and highly relevant in the modern-day context. This paper seeks to add to the existing literature which explores educational methods for teaching complexity sciences to public administrators through a novel analysis that integrates two different psychological domains - applied cognitive psychology and adult developmental psychology. Introducing the notion of thought architecture, this analysis will first acknowledge that public administrators are likely novices in complexity, due to their limited exposure to necessary declarative and conceptual knowledge and their stage of adult development. Second, this analysis will show that features of a complex system exist in tension with instructional methods typically associated with helping novices acquire knowledge or advance in their stage of adult development. In light of this finding, appropriate and useful instructional strategies drawn from these two psychological domains that help to reconcile this tension will be discussed.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360758

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{neil2025,
  title        = {{The challenges of teaching complexity sciences to novice learners in public administration}},
  author       = {Neil Gilbride},
  journal      = {Teaching Public Administration},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360758},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The challenges of teaching complexity sciences to novice learners in public administration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.