A comparative evaluation of mobile charging pods for electric bus operations

Mohd Aiman Khan et al.

Journal of Public Transportation2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2026.100157article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Recent advances in battery technology and the global shift toward sustainable transport have accelerated the adoption of electrified public transit systems. However, the implementation of such systems is often constrained by the need for large battery capacities and the high costs associated with stationary charging infrastructure. This study investigates the potential of Mobile Autonomous Charging Pods (MAPs) which are autonomous mobile charging vehicles as an innovative and cost-effective strategy to support the electrification of high-frequency urban bus lines. Using microscopic simulation for inner-city trunk lines in Stockholm, three charging configurations are evaluated: (i) depot-only charging, (ii) depot charging combined with end-station charging, and (iii) depot charging supported by MAPs. Results show that the MAP-based approach enables a reduction in total battery capacity by up to 67% compared to the depot-only strategy and yields total cost savings of over 7 million USD in total cost of ownership across an 11-year horizon. In addition to reducing capital and grid connection costs, MAPs offer greater operational flexibility and resilience by decentralizing energy delivery and enabling dynamic in-motion or stationary charging. The findings highlight MAPs as a scalable and economically viable solution that complements traditional depot infrastructure, offering a path toward more adaptable and efficient electric public transport networks. • Proposes a MAP-based dynamic charging for flexible electric bus operations. • Provides a baseline greedy heuristic assignment and deployment strategy for MAPs. • Compares MAP vs depot and end-station charging in Stockholm bus network case study. • Compares performance based on battery needs and cost of ownership across charging strategies. • Highlights MAP deployment challenges and future research directions.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2026.100157

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohd2026,
  title        = {{A comparative evaluation of mobile charging pods for electric bus operations}},
  author       = {Mohd Aiman Khan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Transportation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2026.100157},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A comparative evaluation of mobile charging pods for electric bus operations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.