arbiter
JournalsAccount

Institutional Investor Network Centrality and Corporate ESG Rating Divergence: Evidence From China

Wennanxiang Wang et al.

Accounting and Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70177article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating divergence undermines the informational efficiency of capital markets and amplifies systemic vulnerability. To address this concern, we investigate the effect of institutional investor network centrality on firms' ESG rating divergence. Empirical results reveal that institutional investors with higher network centrality can mitigate corporate ESG rating divergence. Mechanism analysis identifies three channels through which this effect operates: improving corporate willingness to disclose ESG information, promoting standardised ESG information disclosure and decreasing strategic ESG disclosure. Heterogeneity tests indicate that the mitigating effect is especially pronounced for firms without ISO certification, non‐state‐owned firms, and those facing limited public scrutiny or weak governmental environmental regulation. Further analysis suggests that institutional investors' governance incentives arise from concerns about potential losses associated with stock price crash risk and liquidity risk. Overall, our results highlight institutional investor network governance as an additional governance channel, particularly salient in settings with weak formal oversight and a fragmented information environment.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70177

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wennanxiang2026,
  title        = {{Institutional Investor Network Centrality and Corporate ESG Rating Divergence: Evidence From China}},
  author       = {Wennanxiang Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting and Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70177},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Institutional Investor Network Centrality and Corporate ESG Rating Divergence: Evidence From China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.