Democracy, public administration, and democratic backsliding

Toby S. James

Policy Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2521170article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.68

What the paper says

There have been concerns about democratic backsliding in many countries around the world. A new research agenda, identifying the impact of democratic erosion on public administration – and whether public administration can act as a firewall to democratic backsliding – has arisen as a result. The relationship between public administration and democracy has often been a source of ambiguity, however. The article argues that the relationship depends upon the concept of democracy that is used. Using a maximalist real democracy approach, good public administration is argued to be an essential component of democracy – rather than an adjunct. Indicators of good public administration quality are developed and patterns of quality are mapped around the world. The article provides a general model of public administration reform connecting political leaders’ attempts to enact executive aggrandizement and bureaucratic resistance into a wider political context. It then develops five clusters of causal linkages between public administration and other aspects of democracy which frame the inquiry of the special issue ahead.

26 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2521170

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{toby2025,
  title        = {{Democracy, public administration, and democratic backsliding}},
  author       = {Toby S. James},
  journal      = {Policy Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2521170},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Democracy, public administration, and democratic backsliding

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.68

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.75 × 0.4 = 0.30
M · momentum1.00 × 0.15 = 0.15
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.