Ordered correlation forest

Riccardo Di Francesco

Econometric Reviews2025https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2024.2429596article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Abstract: Empirical studies in various social sciences often involve categorical outcomes with inherent ordering, such as self-evaluations of subjective well-being and self-assessments in health domains. While ordered choice models, such as the ordered logit and ordered probit, are popular tools for analyzing these outcomes, they may impose restrictive parametric and distributional assumptions. This article introduces a novel estimator, the ordered correlation forest, that can naturally handle non linearities in the data and does not assume a specific error term distribution. The proposed estimator modifies a standard random forest splitting criterion to build a collection of forests, each estimating the conditional probability of a single class. Under an “honesty” condition, predictions are consistent and asymptotically normal. The weights induced by each forest are used to obtain standard errors for the predicted probabilities and the covariates’ marginal effects. Evidence from synthetic data shows that the proposed estimator features a superior prediction performance than alternative forest-based estimators and demonstrates its ability to construct valid confidence intervals for the covariates’ marginal effects. Comparisons using various real-world data sets further highlight the advantages of forest-based estimators over parametric models in larger samples while showing that the ordered correlation forest remains competitive in smaller samples.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2024.2429596

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{riccardo2025,
  title        = {{Ordered correlation forest}},
  author       = {Riccardo Di Francesco},
  journal      = {Econometric Reviews},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2024.2429596},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ordered correlation forest

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.