Demand for weather index insurance: evidence from Indian cotton farmers
Reddyprasanna Diyyala et al.
What the paper says
Purpose Adverse climatic conditions have significantly impacted agricultural production in India. To manage climate risk, weather index insurance (WII) is emerging as a useful tool to transfer risk. However, despite the potential advantages, the adoption of weather-based insurance remains low. Thus, this study aims to examine the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for WII. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 350 cotton farmers in the Virudhunagar district, selected through a multistage sampling approach, incorporating simple random sampling. Data were collected through personal interviews using a pre-tested questionnaire. The logit model is used to analyse how socioeconomic variables, risk aversion (determined using the multiple price list experiment) and risk perception (analysed using a risk matrix) affect weather insurance adoption. Findings Results show that 65% of the surveyed households are willing to participate in WII. Risk aversion and risk perception are positively and significantly associated with insurance uptake. Education, annual income, access to credit and weather-related yield loss also have a significant positive correlation with WTP. However, gender, family size, and access to irrigation are negatively associated with WTP. Research limitations/implications Future studies could be enhanced by including more diverse farm areas and considering other influential factors. Originality/value These findings can assist insurance companies and policymakers in understanding farmers’ risk behaviour and promoting the adoption of WII to improve farmers’ climate resilience.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.