← Back to results Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals Marta Garcia de Blakely et al.
What the paper says Engagement with CALD clients was associated with greater cross-lingual competence regardless of the ethnic status of the clinician. However, specific training in how to work in a cross-lingual context is required to ensure that all clinicians have strategies to manage the barriers they and their client's may face.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2640243 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{marta2026,
title = {{Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals}},
author = {Marta Garcia de Blakely et al.},
journal = {Australian Journal of Psychology},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2640243},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals
AU - al., Marta Garcia de Blakely et
JO - Australian Journal of Psychology
PY - 2026
ER - Marta Garcia de Blakely et al. (2026). Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals. *Australian Journal of Psychology*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2640243 Marta Garcia de Blakely et al.. "Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals." *Australian Journal of Psychology* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2640243. Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals
Marta Garcia de Blakely et al. · Australian Journal of Psychology · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2640243 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.