arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Dynamic Forward Intensities for Multiperiod Default

Dedy Dwi Prastyo et al.

Singapore Economic Review2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826400035article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Using an adaptive Forward Intensities Approach (FIA) we investigate mutiperiod corporate defaults and other delisting schemes. The proposed approach is fully data-driven and is based on adaptive estimation and the selection of optimal estimation windows. Time-dependent model parameters are determined by a sequential testing procedure. This makes this approach adaptive at every time point. Applying the proposed method to monthly data on 2000 U.S. public firms over a sample period from 1991 to 2011, we estimate default probabilities over various prediction horizons. The prediction performance is evaluated against the global FIA that employs all past observations. For the six months prediction horizon, the local adaptive FIA performs with the same accuracy as the benchmark. The default prediction power is improved for the longer horizon (one to three years). Our method can be applied to any other specifications of forward intensities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826400035

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dedy2026,
  title        = {{Dynamic Forward Intensities for Multiperiod Default}},
  author       = {Dedy Dwi Prastyo et al.},
  journal      = {Singapore Economic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826400035},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dynamic Forward Intensities for Multiperiod Default

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.