Esforços regulatórios na América Latina quanto à desinformação em períodos eleitorais

Júlia Meireles Nogueira

Revista do CAAP2025https://doi.org/10.69881/807xs798article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study aims to identify and analyze the regulatory solutions proposed in Latin America in response to the phenomenon of digital disinformation, especially in electoral contexts. Almost all countries in this region, during the period from 2021 to 2024, are undergoing electoral processes, which are affected in their legitimacy by the popularization of digital platforms and, consequently, by the spread of false content. The adopted methodology follows a transnational comparative approach, along with transdisciplinary investigations, to understand the normative trends, progress already achieved, as well as the challenges present in the Latin American region concerning the fight against disinformation, focusing on nine countries with the most significant volume of normative deliberation. The results shows that, in the region, regulatory solutions are still at an early stage, mainly due to challenges such as the complexity of technical concepts, the excessive tendency toward criminalization, and political polarization. Furthermore, as relevant measures to overcome some of these obstacles, greater integration among Latin American countries is suggested, as well as cooperation between states and digital platforms.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69881/807xs798

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{júlia2025,
  title        = {{Esforços regulatórios na América Latina quanto à desinformação em períodos eleitorais}},
  author       = {Júlia Meireles Nogueira},
  journal      = {Revista do CAAP},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69881/807xs798},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Esforços regulatórios na América Latina quanto à desinformação em períodos eleitorais

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.