Mentoring Undergraduate Research in Statistics: Reaping the Benefits and Overcoming the Barriers

Joseph R. Nolan et al.

Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education2020https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1756542article
ABDC B
Weight
0.66

What the paper says

Undergraduate research experiences (UREs), whether within the context of a mentor-mentee experience or a classroom framework, represent an excellent opportunity to expose students to the independent scholarship model. The high impact of undergraduate research has received recent attention in the context of STEM disciplines. Reflecting a 2017 survey of statistics faculty, this article examines the perceived benefits of UREs, as well as barriers to the incorporation of UREs, specifically within the field of statistics. Viewpoints of students, faculty mentors, and institutions are investigated. Further, the article offers several strategies for leveraging characteristics unique to the field of statistics to overcome barriers and thereby provide greater opportunity for undergraduate statistics students to gain research experience.

30 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1756542

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joseph2020,
  title        = {{Mentoring Undergraduate Research in Statistics: Reaping the Benefits and Overcoming the Barriers}},
  author       = {Joseph R. Nolan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1756542},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mentoring Undergraduate Research in Statistics: Reaping the Benefits and Overcoming the Barriers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.66

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.78 × 0.4 = 0.31
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.