arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The impact of personality on pay satisfaction among small business managers in the United States and China

Jonathan C. Shrader & Luke Singer

Journal of Technology Management in China2014https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-05-2014-0031article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect personality has on pay satisfaction among small business managers in China and the USA. Design/methodology/approach – This research is in attempt to further understanding and provide application of how companies can better incentive talent through compensation and benefit programs. The goal is to extend and deepen the comprehension of how to encourage talent pools to increase intrinsic performance through compensation programs. Findings – The measures that were used in this study were the Big Five Personality Test and the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire. Originality/value – Similar results were found across the two countries, and having primary empirical data such as these is original.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-05-2014-0031

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jonathan2014,
  title        = {{The impact of personality on pay satisfaction among small business managers in the United States and China}},
  author       = {Jonathan C. Shrader & Luke Singer},
  journal      = {Journal of Technology Management in China},
  year         = {2014},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-05-2014-0031},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The impact of personality on pay satisfaction among small business managers in the United States and China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.