Open Science and Responsible Science

Liliane Furtado et al.

Journal of Contemporary Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2026260041.enarticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The motivation for this editorial arose from an episode experienced by two of the authors. During a thesis defense, when questioned by a faculty member about the instrument used in her research, a student described how difficult it had been to locate it. What began as a simple search for an instrument widely cited in the literature turned into a true “academic odyssey.” Several articles that relied on the instrument did not present it in full—only a few illustrative items. The seminal study that originally proposed the instrument was written in a language other than English. Attempts to contact the researcher who authored the scale went unanswered. At every step, a new labyrinth emerged in the effort to locate the complete instrument. Along with it grew the feeling that something essential to scientific practice remained inaccessible.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2026260041.en

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liliane2026,
  title        = {{Open Science and Responsible Science}},
  author       = {Liliane Furtado et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Contemporary Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2026260041.en},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Open Science and Responsible Science

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.