Short-term conflict-based crash risk forecasting: A Bayesian conditional peak-over-threshold approach

Depeng Niu & Tarek Sayed

Analytic Methods in Accident Research2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2025.100385article
ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

• Conditional peak-over-threshold models are introduced, with Bayesian inference for real-time crash risk forecasting. • Self-exciting and score-driven conditional peak-over-threshold specifications are demonstrated. • Score-driven peak-over-threshold models with Burr hazard function achieve superior crash risk forecasting performance. • Classical peak-over-threshold models underestimate crash risk by ignoring temporal dependence in extreme traffic conflicts. • The models enable uncertainty quantification in crash risk forecasting, supporting proactive safety interventions. Forecasting short-term crash risks is crucial for real-time road safety management, yet this research area remains largely underexplored. Classical Extreme Value Theory (EVT) models assume independent observations, limiting their ability to capture the clustering behavior in occurrence times and magnitudes of extreme traffic conflicts. To overcome this limitation, we introduce conditional peak-over-threshold (POT) models that incorporate time-varying parameters to simultaneously capture the dynamics of extreme traffic conflicts and enable forecasting for crash risk. Within the framework of marked point process (MPP) and EVT, we develop the conditional POT models based on two observation-driven approaches (self-exciting and score-driven) through Bayesian inference. A dynamic risk measure, Value-at-Risk (VaR), is employed to assess the performance of these conditional POT models for crash risk forecasting. Empirical analysis of rear-end conflict data collected from a signalized intersection across two separate days demonstrates that both self-exciting and score-driven POT models effectively characterize the clustering behavior of extreme traffic conflicts. Furthermore, backtesting confirms that conditional POT models provide more accurate crash risk forecasts than classical POT models, which tend to underestimate crash risk by ignoring temporal dependence in extreme traffic conflicts. Among the examined model specifications, score-driven POT models demonstrate superior forecasting performance. Our proposed Bayesian conditional POT approach provides probabilistic forecasting that enables direct uncertainty quantification and dynamic monitoring of crash risk, thereby supporting informed safety decisions.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2025.100385

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{depeng2025,
  title        = {{Short-term conflict-based crash risk forecasting: A Bayesian conditional peak-over-threshold approach}},
  author       = {Depeng Niu & Tarek Sayed},
  journal      = {Analytic Methods in Accident Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2025.100385},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Short-term conflict-based crash risk forecasting: A Bayesian conditional peak-over-threshold approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.