The moderating role of overlapping audit committee on the relationship between firm profitability and accounting conservatism in Jordan

Laith Alsheyab et al.

Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting2026https://doi.org/10.1504/aajfa.2026.152390article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This research investigated how firm profitability influences conservatism in accounting and how audit committee overlap and its chair overlap can impact this relationship. The study was conducted on Jordanian companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022. This research discovered a positive impact of profitability related to accounting conservatism in Jordanian companies. The study found a moderating role of audit committee overlap and its chair overlap on the association between firm profitability and accounting conservatism. The study findings hold significant relevance for decision-making and regulatory entities in Jordan and neighbouring nations regarding the development of corporate governance, particularly in relation to the overlapping audit committees. The novelty of this study lies in that it is the only study that examines the moderating role of audit committee overlap and its chair overlap on the association between firm profitability and accounting conservatism.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/aajfa.2026.152390

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{laith2026,
  title        = {{The moderating role of overlapping audit committee on the relationship between firm profitability and accounting conservatism in Jordan}},
  author       = {Laith Alsheyab et al.},
  journal      = {Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/aajfa.2026.152390},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The moderating role of overlapping audit committee on the relationship between firm profitability and accounting conservatism in Jordan

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.