A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs

D. M. Pinheiro et al.

Journal of Innovation Management2025https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.004_0001article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Innovation Hubs (IHs) catalyse open innovation and technology transfer within innovation ecosystems (IEs). IHs offer physical as well as virtual structures that enhance innovation. IHs around the world have different dynamics. They differ in terms of their characteristics, activities, and objectives, requiring distinctive forms of management and orchestration adapted to their realities. Thus, to subsidise universities, policy-makers and ecosystem orchestrators, we carried out a meta-synthesis, guided by the paradigm of Design Science Research, to identify IHs typologies. Recognising typologies and their dynamics reduces trial and error in the design, management and orchestration of IHs, increasing their performance. In this article, we present six typologies of IHs based on their dynamics and the class of priority problems they address: corporate, university, government, accelerators, co-working, and thematic. We also seek to explore connections between the typologies and the actors involved in the activities.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.004_0001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{d.2025,
  title        = {{A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs}},
  author       = {D. M. Pinheiro et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Innovation Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.004_0001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Typology Proposal for Innovation Hubs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.