The Right Fit: When Socially Anxious Individuals Gain the Most From Social Interactions

Aurelio Fernández et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261416010article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Social interactions are crucial for social connection and well-being, yet individuals differ in how much they benefit from them. This two-week experience sampling study ( N = 157; 10,547 social interactions) explored how trait social anxiety shapes interaction quality (i.e., pleasantness, playfulness, and meaningfulness) and momentary energy. We also examined the moderating roles of interaction channel (face-to-face vs. mediated), group size (large vs. small), and familiarity (familiar vs. unfamiliar). Dimensions of interaction quality were robustly positively associated with increased momentary energy at both the within- and between-person levels. Social anxiety was negatively related to energy. For interaction quality, the social context mattered: the negative effect of social anxiety on playfulness was attenuated in small (vs. large) group interactions, and the negative effect on meaningfulness was weaker in mediated (vs. face-to-face) interactions. The findings suggest that more controllable and close-knit social contexts better align with the psychological needs of socially anxious individuals.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261416010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aurelio2026,
  title        = {{The Right Fit: When Socially Anxious Individuals Gain the Most From Social Interactions}},
  author       = {Aurelio Fernández et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261416010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Right Fit: When Socially Anxious Individuals Gain the Most From Social Interactions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.