‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage

Tom Vaughan

Millenium: journal of international studies2025https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298251380200article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

How can futures without nuclear weapons be imagined from within International Relations (IR)? This article details a speculative future-making exercise that applied the collage method in the IR classroom to gain insight into how participants think about nuclear weapons futures and the obstacles encountered to conceiving of futures without nuclear weapons. It finds that two broad thought structures are at work to condition the boundaries of imagination: ‘nuclear exceptionalism’, which works to constrain imaginary processes, and ‘nuclear ambivalence’, which permits the imagination of a wider range of futures. This article makes two core contributions. The first is pedagogical, demonstrating how collaging can facilitate critical reflection on the boundaries of imagination regarding nuclear weapons. The second is conceptual, illustrating the development and practical application of the ‘worldmaking’ concept in IR, widening its analytical potential and showing researchers and practitioners a creative method of advancing an anti-nuclear politics of the future.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298251380200

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tom2025,
  title        = {{‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage}},
  author       = {Tom Vaughan},
  journal      = {Millenium: journal of international studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298251380200},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.