arbiter
JournalsAccount

Seek and hide: Retention of lenient auditors in the anti-corruption campaign in China

Yanming Cao et al.

Australian Journal of Management2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962261425553article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates auditor retention behavior among state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the context of the anti-corruption campaign launched in China in 2012. We find that SOEs with lenient auditors are less likely to switch from their incumbent auditors following the campaign, suggesting that this retention may be driven by efforts to obscure corrupt practices. Further analysis reveals this tendency is particularly pronounced in SOEs with higher entertainment and travel expenses, weaker corporate governance structures, and those engaging smaller or non-specialized auditors. By shedding light on the interplay between SOEs’ strategic decisions and audit firm characteristics, this study provides valuable insights into the motivations underlying auditor retention. It makes a significant contribution to the expanding body of literature examining the demand for lenient auditors from a public governance perspective. JEL Classification : D22, M41, M42

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962261425553

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yanming2026,
  title        = {{Seek and hide: Retention of lenient auditors in the anti-corruption campaign in China}},
  author       = {Yanming Cao et al.},
  journal      = {Australian Journal of Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962261425553},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Seek and hide: Retention of lenient auditors in the anti-corruption campaign in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.