← Back to results Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors P. J. Zaire et al.
Abstract Consistent PCMH recognition and chronic disease management are essential for improving CRC screening rates in FQHCs. By integrating these population health management strategies, FQHCs can proactively address screening disparities. Prioritizing these organizational-level approaches may strengthen healthcare equity and expand CRC screening for historically marginalized communities.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70082 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{p.2026,
title = {{Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors}},
author = {P. J. Zaire et al.},
journal = {Health Services Research},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70082},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors
AU - al., P. J. Zaire et
JO - Health Services Research
PY - 2026
ER - P. J. Zaire et al. (2026). Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors. *Health Services Research*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70082 P. J. Zaire et al.. "Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors." *Health Services Research* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70082. Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Explicating Organizational Level Factors
P. J. Zaire et al. · Health Services Research · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70082 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.