Clustering market regimes using the Wasserstein distance

Blanka Horvath et al.

Journal of Computational Finance2024https://doi.org/10.21314/jcf.2024.005preprint
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

The problem of rapid and automated detection of distinct market regimes is a topic of great interest to financial mathematicians and practitioners alike. In this paper, we outline an unsupervised learning algorithm for clustering financial time-series into a suitable number of temporal segments (market regimes). As a special case of the above, we develop a robust algorithm that automates the process of classifying market regimes. The method is robust in the sense that it does not depend on modelling assumptions of the underlying time series as our experiments with real datasets show. This method -- dubbed the Wasserstein $k$-means algorithm -- frames such a problem as one on the space of probability measures with finite $p^\text{th}$ moment, in terms of the $p$-Wasserstein distance between (empirical) distributions. We compare our WK-means approach with a more traditional clustering algorithms by studying the so-called maximum mean discrepancy scores between, and within clusters. In both cases it is shown that the WK-means algorithm vastly outperforms all considered competitor approaches. We demonstrate the performance of all approaches both in a controlled environment on synthetic data, and on real data.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21314/jcf.2024.005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{blanka2024,
  title        = {{Clustering market regimes using the Wasserstein distance}},
  author       = {Blanka Horvath et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Computational Finance},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21314/jcf.2024.005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Clustering market regimes using the Wasserstein distance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.