Chinese mobile smart solutions, users’ mobility intentions and users’ behavior

Volker G. Kuppelwieser et al.

Asian Business and Management2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-026-00322-2article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Urban mobility decisions have become increasingly complex as transportation options expand beyond traditional modes to include ride-hailing services and on-demand shuttles. This paper investigates how consumers make these mobility choices and examines the intention-behavior relationship in real-world contexts. Three studies identified key decision-making factors and connected them to established mobility research. The main study developed a mobile application offering an access-based shuttle service, capturing 39,000 orders from 950 users over six months in Shanghai. By analyzing both stated intentions and actual behavior, the study examined travel mode choices in everyday mobility contexts. Findings reveal that consumer decisions rely primarily on three core dimensions—punctuality, predictability, and convenience—rather than the diverse factors emphasized in previous research. Intentions closely mirror actual behavior in routine mobility services. Consumers simplify decision-making by focusing on fundamental service characteristics, with additional bundled features playing minimal roles in their choices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-026-00322-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{volker2026,
  title        = {{Chinese mobile smart solutions, users’ mobility intentions and users’ behavior}},
  author       = {Volker G. Kuppelwieser et al.},
  journal      = {Asian Business and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-026-00322-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Chinese mobile smart solutions, users’ mobility intentions and users’ behavior

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.