The role of parenting style and socio-economic status in child development: Understanding the underlying dynamics

Eleonora Matteazzi & Vincenzo Prete

Economics and Human Biology2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2026.101584article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We apply latent class analysis to the German Family Panel data to identify latent family types and assess the association between various aspects of the home environment and child development. These aspects include family socio-economic background, parenting style, and parental involvement in children's learning activities. Child development is measured across several dimensions, including schooling outcomes, non-cognitive abilities, psychological well-being, and maintaining a healthy weight. Our findings suggest that a rich socio-economic background appears more strongly associated with schooling performance, social integration, and maintaining a healthy weight than parenting style. In contrast, self-esteem and psychological well-being are more closely related to parenting quality, indicating that good parenting may compensate for the disadvantages of growing up in a poor socio-economic family environment. For most outcomes, additive dynamics between parenting style and socio-economic status correspond to larger development gaps between children from the least and most advantaged families.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2026.101584

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eleonora2026,
  title        = {{The role of parenting style and socio-economic status in child development: Understanding the underlying dynamics}},
  author       = {Eleonora Matteazzi & Vincenzo Prete},
  journal      = {Economics and Human Biology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2026.101584},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The role of parenting style and socio-economic status in child development: Understanding the underlying dynamics

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.