The Generativity of Governance Configurations: How Governance Factors Coalesce to Spur Local Green Co‐Creation

Christopher Ansell et al.

Governance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70115article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Research shows that interactive and networked governance aiming to co‐create solutions are potent tools for addressing complex problems and that a configurational approach can improve our understanding of how governance conditions combine to produce effective collaboration and innovative results. We argue that the concept of generativity, which refers to social mechanisms that prompt, drive and scaffold co‐creation can complement and improve configurational approaches. To understand how governance factors not only combine but also coalesce into generative social mechanisms spurring co‐creation, we conduct a comparative mixed‐methods case study of local green partnerships in Denmark, South Africa, the U.S., and Vietnam. Based on this analysis, the paper identifies six generic functions of governance generativity: Catalyzing storylines, distributed action models, institutional templates for action, innovation triggers, productive technologies, and leadership creating internal cohesion and public support. Generative mechanisms with these generic functions can be expected to advance the co‐creation of sustainability transitions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70115

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2026,
  title        = {{The Generativity of Governance Configurations: How Governance Factors Coalesce to Spur Local Green Co‐Creation}},
  author       = {Christopher Ansell et al.},
  journal      = {Governance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70115},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Generativity of Governance Configurations: How Governance Factors Coalesce to Spur Local Green Co‐Creation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.