Dyadic privacy management: The influence of dyadic privacy norms on the disclosure of co-owned information in romantic relationships

Anne Zöll et al.

Information & Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104301article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Previous research has emphasized online decisions by individual owners about disclosure of private information. Less is known about the disclosure of co-owned information by romantic partners in digital environments, despite such sharing being common and risky. We posit that in digitally mediated contexts, individuals’ decisions to share co-owned information are shaped not only by their self-centered privacy concerns and perceived benefits, but also by dyadic privacy norms. These norms, we posit, act beyond individual-level, self-centered privacy reflections in two significant ways: (1) They directly influence co-owned information disclosure and (2) they influence the weights assigned to individual privacy concerns. We further theorize that dyadic privacy norm accessibility is impacted by social identity salience, which can be manipulated through priming. The findings based on a realistic paradigm largely support our assertions but also produce surprising results. They highlight the need for further study of the role of dyadic privacy norms and social identities in multilevel privacy management.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104301

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anne2026,
  title        = {{Dyadic privacy management: The influence of dyadic privacy norms on the disclosure of co-owned information in romantic relationships}},
  author       = {Anne Zöll et al.},
  journal      = {Information & Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104301},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dyadic privacy management: The influence of dyadic privacy norms on the disclosure of co-owned information in romantic relationships

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.