‘Do not lecture us’: Online backlash against the National Trust addressing its links to colonialism and historic slavery

Adrian Yip & Rachel Keighley

Discourse & Society2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251408421article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Racism in rural England is pervasive yet underacknowledged due to popular depictions of rural England as idyllic and the epitome of quintessential national virtues, culture and identity. This article discusses one case study of the National Trust, which has begun to address its links to colonialism and historic slavery, and in doing so, faced significant online backlash, embedded within broader discriminatory and racist practices. Drawing on corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), we explore public discourses around how race and colonialism are constructed, contested, and resisted in online spaces. We argue that vehement reactions against the National Trust stem from deep emotional connections to history – history is perceived as sacred, and the National Trust is entrusted with preserving rather than commenting on historical artefacts and places. We demonstrate how national pride fuels opposition to the foregrounding of colonialism and historic slavery, especially when Britain is seen to be unfairly targeted.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251408421

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{adrian2026,
  title        = {{‘Do not lecture us’: Online backlash against the National Trust addressing its links to colonialism and historic slavery}},
  author       = {Adrian Yip & Rachel Keighley},
  journal      = {Discourse & Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251408421},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘Do not lecture us’: Online backlash against the National Trust addressing its links to colonialism and historic slavery

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.