Framework of managerial wisdom: an analysis using the TOPSIS and MICMAC process

Hasan Valiyan et al.

American Journal of Business (AJB)2024https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-10-2023-0172article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.57

What the paper says

Purpose Behavioral characteristics and the existence of personal knowledge and skills that are essential in forming a capable manager with specialized insight, is one of the most important evaluation processes in appointing a manager. Wisdom as a trait of a set of personal characteristics and cognitive knowledge of a capable manager will gain competitive advantages for the company and external stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to present the framework of managerial financial wisdom through qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Design/methodology/approach The study uses grounded theory methodology to identify factors for managerial financial wisdom and uses a MICMAC process to evaluate the power of driving and dependence among factors. MaxQDA software was used for data coding and analysis. The MICMAC process by determining the location of each of the sub-themes in the four-dimensional matrix, seeks to determine the most effective criterion in the context of the study. The method of data collection is mixed and in terms of philosophical nature, this study is inductive/comparative. Findings The results of the research in the qualitative part indicate the presentation of a framework based on two categories, four components, and thirty themes. The results of the quantitative part of the study also showed that the most important factor of managerial financial wisdom is market-oriented values. Finally, it was found that the social trust caused by managerial financial wisdom is considered a factor in gaining more shares in the capital market due to the positive stimulus in this dimension. Originality/value The study is relevant for both practitioners and academia and has significant implications. For practitioners, the structural linkages identified will help enhance managerial wisdom effectiveness and drive the critical metrics for financial decisions and shareholders' rights protection. The study may help financial market practitioners better understand future policies. Academia and researchers can take reference from methodologies used in this study for exploring factors of interest and developing matrix linkages among them.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-10-2023-0172

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hasan2024,
  title        = {{Framework of managerial wisdom: an analysis using the TOPSIS and MICMAC process}},
  author       = {Hasan Valiyan et al.},
  journal      = {American Journal of Business (AJB)},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-10-2023-0172},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Framework of managerial wisdom: an analysis using the TOPSIS and MICMAC process

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.57

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.62 × 0.4 = 0.25
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.