← Back to results Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing John Nowland et al.
Abstract Inderscience is a global company, a dynamic leading independent journal publisher disseminates the latest research across the broad fields of science, engineering and technology; management, public and business administration; environment, ecological economics and sustainable development; computing, ICT and internet/web services, and related areas.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2025.10076872 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{john2025,
title = {{Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing}},
author = {John Nowland et al.},
journal = {International Journal of Sports Management and Marketing},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2025.10076872},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing
AU - al., John Nowland et
JO - International Journal of Sports Management and Marketing
PY - 2025
ER - John Nowland et al. (2025). Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing. *International Journal of Sports Management and Marketing*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2025.10076872 John Nowland et al.. "Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing." *International Journal of Sports Management and Marketing* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2025.10076872. Who gets the Blame for Poor Performance in Extreme Teams An Analysis of Formula 1 racing
John Nowland et al. · International Journal of Sports Management and Marketing · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2025.10076872 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.