arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Environmental, social and governance reporting quality and firm lag vs. lead performance: evidence from Sri Lankan listed companies

S.S.J. Patabendige et al.

International Journal of Business Excellence2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.152018article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ESG reporting is now standard practice, yet its performance implications remain contested.Prior studies have been largely fragmented, taking a biased stance on selected ESG dimensions or focusing on financial lag indicators with little interest in lead indicators, resulting in an incomplete understanding of ESG disclosures and their impact.Using five-year panel data from 60 listed firms, this paper fills these gaps.Following the 2023 GRI guidelines, four disclosure quality indices, both individual and composite, are constructed and examined against lag indicators (ROA, ROE, ROS) and a lead indicator, MV.Findings reveal that composite ESG acts as a signal of value creation with a stronger correlation with ROS and MV.However, when disaggregated, possible temporal differences emerge, with environmental reporting primarily associated with lead and the other two with lag indicators, suggesting that ESG disclosure is part of an intentional strategy rather than a response to external pressures.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.152018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{s.s.j.2026,
  title        = {{Environmental, social and governance reporting quality and firm lag vs. lead performance: evidence from Sri Lankan listed companies}},
  author       = {S.S.J. Patabendige et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Excellence},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.152018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Environmental, social and governance reporting quality and firm lag vs. lead performance: evidence from Sri Lankan listed companies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.