arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Keynes-Knight and the de Finetti-Savage's Approaches to Probability: an Economic Interpretation

Rogério Arthmar

History of Economic Ideas2016https://doi.org/10.1400/242582article
ABDC B
Weight
0.69

What the paper says

The definition of ‘uncertainty’ proposed by Bruno de Finetti and Leonard J. Savage is significantly different from the one advanced by J. M. Keynes and Frank H. Knight. Recent studies seem to have overlooked this aspect of de Finetti and Savage’s 1962 paper "Sul Modo di Scegliere le Probabilità Iniziali". This particular work has been cited as supporting the claim that there are similarities between the de Finetti-Savage’s conception of uncertainty and the Keynes-Knight’s approach. This claim, however, loses much of its appeal once it is realized that the discussion by de Finetti and Savage involves only the initial probabilities.

55 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1400/242582

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rogério2016,
  title        = {{The Keynes-Knight and the de Finetti-Savage's Approaches to Probability: an Economic Interpretation}},
  author       = {Rogério Arthmar},
  journal      = {History of Economic Ideas},
  year         = {2016},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1400/242582},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Keynes-Knight and the de Finetti-Savage's Approaches to Probability: an Economic Interpretation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.69

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.42 × 0.15 = 0.06
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.