← Back to results Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study? S.W. Davies & Lawrence W.C. Lai
What the paper says This article discusses the problem of island studies, predicated on the notion of ‘islandness’, as a field apart from land studies by showing that as a unit of recognition an island is only a highly specific kind of land. For every island its ‘islandness’ is unique, but only in the mode that all highly localised inhabited land is. The discussion finds the case of proponents of island studies for any significant re/ordering planning practice wanting.
2 citations
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2025.2 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{s.w.2025,
title = {{Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study?}},
author = {S.W. Davies & Lawrence W.C. Lai},
journal = {Town Planning Review},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2025.2},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study?
AU - Davies, S.W.
AU - Lai, Lawrence W.C.
JO - Town Planning Review
PY - 2025
ER - S.W. Davies & Lawrence W.C. Lai (2025). Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study?. *Town Planning Review*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2025.2 S.W. Davies & Lawrence W.C. Lai. "Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study?." *Town Planning Review* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2025.2. Is ‘island study’ but a form of land study?
S.W. Davies & Lawrence W.C. Lai · Town Planning Review · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2025.2 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10 M · momentum 0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.