Study on Bidirectional Cost Sharing and Government Subsidy Coordination Mechanism of Dual-channel Green Supply Chain with Carbon Reduction
Shengqiang Hu et al.
What the paper says
Against the increasingly severe global pollution and greenhouse effect, strengthening environmental governance and cutting carbon emissions has become a universal consensus. Under China’s “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” goals, this paper focuses on a dual-channel green supply chain comprising a manufacturer and a retailer, where market demand correlates linearly with retail price, carbon emissions and green sales efforts. We establish game models to derive and compare optimal decisions and profits of supply chain members under centralized and decentralized decision-making. Taking the decentralized model as a benchmark, we propose three coordination mechanisms: bidirectional cost sharing, government subsidy, and their combination. We further obtain optimal coordination factors to realize Pareto improvement, reduce carbon emissions and boost social welfare. Results show that an optimal direct sales ratio maximizes supply chain profit under decentralization; bidirectional cost sharing aligns carbon emissions and sales efforts with centralized decision-making; the integrated mechanism minimizes carbon emissions and sales efforts with minimal government subsidies. This paper innovates by proposing the integrated coordination mechanism and exploring the optimal combination of key factors to achieve a multi-win situation.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.