Firms’ DARQ readiness and marketing implications: a systematic literature review
Ali N. Tehrani et al.
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to systematically review literature across diverse disciplines, including marketing, management and information systems, to synthesise insights on firms’ readiness to adopt and implement DARQ technologies and their marketing implications. DARQ technologies are emerging and cutting-edge technologies, including Distributed Ledger Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Extended Reality and Quantum Computing (hence, DARQ). Design/methodology/approach Through a systematic review of over 2,500 papers across three databases, this study distilled a focused sample of 88 papers. It comprehensively explores the reported dimensions, antecedents, outcomes and marketing implications of firms’ readiness for DARQ technologies. Findings This study identified three categories of factors that determine DARQ readiness: technological, organisational and environmental. In addition, this study identified external antecedents of DARQ readiness, such as environmental uncertainty and supply chain collaboration, as well as internal antecedents, like firm size and technology trust. It also explored the outcomes of DARQ readiness, including its impact on internal, external and interactive marketing, successful adoption and various performance metrics. Research limitations/implications The study acknowledges potential limitations and suggests areas for further exploration, contributing to the ongoing discourse on firms’ DARQ readiness. Practical implications The findings provide actionable insights for organisations looking to leverage DARQ technologies by identifying essential resources and capabilities and understanding key intricacies involved in the adoption process. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature on organisational DARQ readiness by presenting a conceptual framework that explains its dimensions, antecedents and marketing outcomes. It also identifies theme-based research gaps and sets an agenda for future research.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.