arbiter
JournalsAccount

'A witness of truth': The Court of Appeal's cardinal sin in 'Pell v the Queen' (2020) 376 ALR 478

Samuel H. Beer & Charlotte Butchart

Adelaide Law Review2020article
ABDC A
Weight
0.26

Abstract

Some decisions of the High Court are worthy of comment because they involve a particularly difficult question of law, others because of their public interest. 'Pell v The Queen' (2020) 376 ALR 478 ...

Cite this paper

@article{samuel2020,
  title        = {{'A witness of truth': The Court of Appeal's cardinal sin in 'Pell v the Queen' (2020) 376 ALR 478}},
  author       = {Samuel H. Beer & Charlotte Butchart},
  journal      = {Adelaide Law Review},
  year         = {2020},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

'A witness of truth': The Court of Appeal's cardinal sin in 'Pell v the Queen' (2020) 376 ALR 478

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.