arbiter
JournalsAccount

Regulating financial advice: Lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada

Hazel Bateman & Geoffrey Kingston

JASSA: The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance2014article
ABDC B
Weight
0.34

Abstract

In November 2014 the Senate disallowed the Corporations Amendment (Streamlining of Future of Financial Advice) Bill. Now is an opportune time to stand back and draw out implications for Australia from how financial advice is regulated in the leading common law countries. We also draw out implications from the debates in those countries about the regulation of advice. An earlier version of this paper was presented to the 2014 Australian Centre for Financial Studies' Melbourne Money and Finance Conference.

2 citations

Cite this paper

@article{hazel2014,
  title        = {{Regulating financial advice: Lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada}},
  author       = {Hazel Bateman & Geoffrey Kingston},
  journal      = {JASSA: The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance},
  year         = {2014},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Regulating financial advice: Lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.