arbiter
JournalsAccount

Why Equity Crowdfunding Investors Reject Opportunities: An Exploration of Negative Attributes

Daniel Berliner & Eli Gimmon

Eastern Economic Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-026-00325-zarticle
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines investors’ rejection criteria in equity crowdfunding, an under-researched area, through the lens of Elimination-By-Aspects and Prospect Theories. Using real-time Verbal Protocol Analysis with a proprietary simulated equity crowdfunding platform, we found that rejection decisions were primarily driven by loss aversion and sequential elimination of alternatives. We identify nine deal-killer criteria, including high share prices, lack of transparency, low market potential, and strong future competitors, which trigger immediate campaign rejection. Our findings reveal notable similarities with the rejection criteria employed by traditional equity investors, such as business angels and venture capitalists, as well as by stock market and IPO investors, suggesting that decision patterns transcend investment contexts. This study contributes to theory by extending cognitive decision-making frameworks to the equity crowdfunding context and offers practical implications for entrepreneurs and platform managers, alongside propositions for future research.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-026-00325-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2026,
  title        = {{Why Equity Crowdfunding Investors Reject Opportunities: An Exploration of Negative Attributes}},
  author       = {Daniel Berliner & Eli Gimmon},
  journal      = {Eastern Economic Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-026-00325-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Why Equity Crowdfunding Investors Reject Opportunities: An Exploration of Negative Attributes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.